A Watertight Approach to Flood Insurance

With the Environment Agency citing that one in six homes in England are at risk from various forms of flooding, flood insurance has become a much debated topic of late. 

In the third of a series of articles penned by trainees of MJP Conveyancing as apart of the Company's ongoing training programme, Beth Slaughter writes:

Whilst Britain was battered by strong storms earlier this year, the conveyancing industry became inundated with concerns over the availability and affordability of flood insurance for homeowners. With the Water Bill currently passing through Parliament, this article indulges the national obsession with the weather, analysing the current political position as to flood insurance in relation to leasehold property, as well as what issues a potential purchaser of a leasehold property should be wary of when entering the leasehold property market.

Until June 2013, there existed an agreement between the UK government and the insurance industry which permitted individuals to obtain flood risk insurance for their properties even though they might be located in a high risk area and, in exchange, the government promised to maintain its spending on flood defences. This ‘Statement of Principles’ was only ever intended to be a temporary measure and has been criticised for its restriction of customer choice – insurers are only committed to their existing customers and new insurers can decide to whom to offer flood insurance and, additionally, the Statement does not guarantee affordable insurance premiums or manageable excesses for homeowners. The Water Bill Act 2014 has posed an opportunity for the government to turn the tide on the current approach to flood insurance, ensuring that it remains widely affordable and available – this is manifest in their Flood Re proposal, which is due to come into force in 2015. In essence, Flood Re provides that all buildings insurance will carry a levy that will be used to subsidise flood claims from high-risk households, thus reducing the premiums homeowners have to pay. Unfortunately, as currently defined, Flood Re will exclude buildings cover for flood insurance within a variety of sectors including council homes, the private rented sector, and, notably, leasehold properties.

With respect to leasehold properties, it is usually the responsibility of the Freeholder – or Management Company – to insure the building; they, in turn, pass this cost on to the leaseholder through their management charges. Insurance providers thus dub leasehold property to be ‘non-domestic’ and protection under the Flood Re scheme as it currently stands would be void. It has been argued that the decision to exclude leasehold property from Flood Re is politically motivated, as it prevents homeowners subsiding businesses, however, this is a fallacy, as it is the leaseholder themselves that would ultimately suffer. Ironically, the ‘floodgates’ argument has also been cited as a reason for the narrow delineation of property in Flood Re, as expanding the scope of the government’s proposals would push up the levy on all households; as a spokesman for the Association of British Insurers states: ‘Excluded properties should still get insurance, it’s just the cost won’t be capped. Flood Re is designed to focus on areas where the lack of affordable and available cover is most acute. We have to draw the line somewhere’. Both the British Property Federation (BPF) and the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) strongly oppose Flood Re as currently defined; the Director General of the CML note that they ‘find it difficult to believe that the original policy intention was to exclude a whole swathe of residential property from the stated aim of ensuring that affordable flood insurance continued to be available across the market’.  

The potential purchaser of a leasehold property has much to consider in respect of flood risk insurance. Under the Law Society regulations, when buying a property a Conveyancer should make the client aware of the potential flood risk to some properties; though conveyancers cannot compel a client to carry out an environmental search and a flood search, these are strongly recommended. Purchasers should note that their legal advisors can report to them on the search results, but cannot comment on any specialist issues which arise in the search – such concerns should be referred to a surveyor. Further information regarding the prevalence of flooding in any given area can also be obtained free-of-charge on the Flood Agency website – http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/floods/  - however, visitors to this site should note that it only records flooding in relation to river or sea level changes, and does not provide information about a specific property, whereas specific searches draw on more detailed data. It is for these limitations that purchasers should not solely rely on this website.  

As aforementioned, it is usually the case with leasehold properties that the Freeholder – or Managing Agent – arrange the insurance policy for the building. Purchasers should request a copy of the insurance policy and provide the same to a specialist broker who will be able to advise them as to the adequacy of the cover. Caution should be taken that the policy is sufficient for the particular building in question, incorporating both the internal and external elements of the building. Insurance might notionally cover a building for flood damage, but with heavy caveats – excesses may be large and there may be particular exclusions. Indeed, if flooding becomes an uninsured risk, the leaseholder may be liable to make good any damage depending on the wording of the lease.

Finally, as the CML demands flood insurance as standard, considerable increases in insurance premiums and excesses could affect the affordability – and even viability – of mortgages. The Law Society notes that lenders are increasingly likely to investigate the flood risk of a property when undertaking a valuation and may impose requirements on the mortgagee as a result of their findings. Difficulties in obtaining mortgages and insurance may impact of the saleability of leasehold properties, reducing the number of potential purchasers and purchase price alike. 

Purchasers should consider that if a property is in a high risk flood zone, it does not necessarily that they should not purchase the property; the purchase price could be re-negotiated to allow monies to be invested in flood resistance measures on the property, such as non-returning valves and self-raising barriers.

 With an estimated five million leasehold properties in England and Wales and approximately 840,000 thought to be at risk of flooding, issues surrounding the accessibility and affordability of flood insurance is no small matter. As Ian Fletcher, the Director of Policy at BPF, notes: ‘every property that is occupied is somebody’s home and investment. Flood doesn’t discriminate between freehold and leasehold…and it is of small comfort having contents cover if the building itself is left uninhabitable’. Perhaps the Government will rescue thousands of leaseholders in an eleventh hour amendment to the Water Bill; if not, individuals are best to err on the side of caution when buying leasehold property so that they are not submerged under spiralling insurance premiums.

Morgan Jones and Pett are solicitors who provide legal advice and services to clients based in England and Wales and who can be contacted on 01603877000 or via email at davidpett@m-j-p.co.uk

Buying and selling a property in England or Wales should carry a “Health Warning”

The legal system used to convey a property from one person to another has not changed since 1925 and as it currently stands as a Seller or Buyer each time you enter a transaction you are running the risk of sustaining a financial loss.

In a world where the focus is on consumer protection there are no safeguards offering protection when a transaction breaks down before contracts of sale are exchanged.

If you are selling a property or buying a property either party in that transaction can, as the law currently stands, pull out of the sale/purchase at any time up to the exchange of the contract of sale.

This means that the seller who had accepted an offer by a buyer, who has instructed a Solicitor, and invested time and emotion into the progression of a transaction could after months of marketing the property, find that the buyer has, at the last moment, decided to pull out.

During that period it is probable that the property has come off the market meaning the seller has lost numerous opportunities to find a serious purchaser.  This could, in a market where in certain parts of the Country, falling prices are still, result in a loss to the seller.

The loss to a buyer is often a lot worse when a buyer puts an offer in, it is accepted, Solicitors are instructed, a survey is arranged, only to then find later in the process that that the seller has  decided to pull out of the transaction. The buyer has no recourse against the seller, the fees incurred up until that point, often ranging between £1,000.00 and £1,500.00, are lost. There may be exposure to additional loss, if as in certain parts of the country, house prices are increasing.

I often come across incidences such as this and I share a couple of my experiences:-

“I paid for a survey costing £500.00. It came back disclosing faults. I tried to re-negotiate the offer price but the seller did not want to know. I had to walk away without my £500.00 and without a house”.

“I paid £850.00 for a survey on a different house. It came back with clear findings. After several weeks of phoning the Agent and the Vendor asking for a Contract and other related documents I was informed that he seller simply changed his mind and did not want to sell. I was left having to meet the cost of the survey and Solicitors charges of £400.00”.

So what can you do to try and avoid having to meet the cost of an abortive transaction?

If you are a seller it is advisable to ask the selling agent to find out whether the buyer has a mortgage, whether the buyer needs to sell another property before the purchase can complete, and whether the buyer is willing to pay to lodge with the agent a deposit to enable the property to be taken off the market and the transaction to proceed to exchange within a set period of time. This latter arrangement is quite prevalent in areas where house prices are continuing to rise.

I have come across other transactions where the seller has said to the buyer that if the transaction does not complete within a certain period of time the price of the property will increase.

If you are a buyer it might be worth speaking with the selling agent to find out how long the property has been on the market, whether there has been any prior transactions and if there have to try and ascertain the reason for their collapse. The Agent may be reluctant to give this information but you should push for it. It is also advisable to find out whether the seller has a property to purchase since this might also delay the transaction and give greater scope for failure.

There is need for the current and archaic system to be re-formed.

Then use of deposits by both the seller and the purchaser would be a way of securing some degree of commitment to the transaction before major expense is incurred. Alternatively, perhaps the time has come to look at how the selling and buying process works in Scotland and adopting this as a model.

Finally on this subject I share with you an experience that I recently came across where a seller decided that he was not prepared to sell his property to my client because he lived at the property for many years and was not happy that my client was intending to let the property out rather than use it as a ‘home’. It is regrettable that the seller did not disclose this to my client before a survey was undertaken, legal costs incurred and we were on the verge of exchanging contracts of sale! 

 Morgan Jones and Pett are solicitors who provide legal advice and services to clients based in England and Wales and who can be contacted on 01603877000 or via email at davidpett@m-j-p.co.uk

Flash Flooding Risk - Ignore it at your peril

Are solicitors and those working with property doing enough to protect homebuyers?

Most solicitors will obtain an environmental search result and this will disclose whether the property to be purchased is close to or within a flood plain. But however many of those solicitors actually check to see whether the result includes areas where over the past ten years land and property has suffered damage from pluvial or flash flooding?

Flooding is probably the most significant natural hazard we face in the UK and around 2.8 million people are at risk from pluvial, or rain related, flooding, which represents around one- third of all flood risk in the UK. This figure could increase by 1.2m by 2050 due to a combination of climate change and population change. Population change has the potential to put three times more people at risk than climate change.

Since 2000, insurers have paid out £4.5 billion to customers whose homes or businesses have been hit by flooding. The 2007 summer floods were responsible for £3 billion of payments alone. It is estimated that the total value of assets under flood risk is more than £200 billion.

Pluvial flooding occurs when an extremely heavy downpour of rain saturates the urban drainage system and the excess water cannot be absorbed. This can occur without warning and in the worst cases, such as happened in Glasgow, York and Hull can cause huge destruction.

So what does this mean for the homeowner?

Increased Premiums

To begin with those in affected areas are likely to see increase in premiums and others continue to remain at risk of being priced out of insurance in twelve months’ time.

Possible non-availability of insurance

The ABI and the Government are still locked in negotiations over whether the insurance industry should continue to guarantee insurance for those who live in high-risk areas.

Without a new approach, the ABI estimates that up to 200,000 property owners will struggle to get affordable flood insurance when the current agreement with the Government ends in June 2013.

Possible non-availability of mortgages

The Council of Mortgage Lenders warned that the “big and significant issue” surrounding the potential lack of flood insurance would inevitably impact upon the housing market.  Significant increases in premiums or excesses "could compromise the affordability of the mortgages" and make it harder for the homeowner to find a mortgage. 



Possibly left with an ‘unsalable’ Property

Realistically if a property has been flooded in the past it is unlikely that someone will be interested in taking the property on particularly when there is a risk insurance cover could be expensive or possibly unavailable.  You also need to ask would you want to be living in a property when there is a risk that your home could be affected by flooding?

So this brings me back to where I started, are lawyers doing enough to protect clients from these possible consequences?  As a buyer what should you be looking to do to make sure your lawyer is carrying out checks on flooding?

If you are selling a property that has a flood history then this needs to be disclosed since if you fail to do so and the buyer relies on the representation the transaction could be set aside if the buyer later found out you had misled him.

If you are buying then you should make sure your lawyer carries out an environmental search and that the search result contain information on flash flooding.     If the property is in or close to a flood plain you should always invest in a flood report to obtain greater detail of the flood risk.   Paying £40 for a report is a small price to pay for the comfort of the information it will provide.

Check on Google as to whether there have been any reports of flash flooding in the area.   

Visit the Flood Agency website though make sure any information you rely on includes the risk of flash floods.

Check with your insurer in advance of exchanging contracts to make sure the post code of the property will not lead to you having to pay more for your insurance or whether there is a risk that the property may become uninsurable.

Inspect the property carefully or better still get your surveyor to report to you on whether there is evidence of past flood damage.

The message is that we should all exercise more care when we look at purchasing property to ensure the flood risk is given the priority is clearly warrants.

Morgan Jones and Pett are solicitors who provide legal advice and services to clients based in England and Wales and who can be contacted on 01603877000 or via email at davidpett@m-j-p.co.uk

Flood risk alert for future home owners and coveyancers

Buying a property that may be within the range of a flood plain has become even riskier due to the news that around 200,000 homes at risk from flooding could face problems getting insurance from next year.

Properties that have a 75% chance of flooding in any one year are those most at risk. Boston and Skegness in Lincolnshire is the constituency with the most homes at significant risk of  flooding with 7,550 properties under threat, followed by the Vale of Clwyd (7,339 homes), Folkestone and Hythe (7,196), and Windsor (7,125). Some properties in Great Yarmouth also fall into this category.

The reason for this is that an existing deal with the Government expires in 2013 and time is running out for ongoing talks about a new safety net arrangement.

The Association of British Insurers’ director-general Otto Thoresen said: "Insurers want to make sure that every home has access to affordable insurance, should the worst happen, and we're concerned that those people most at risk will lose out unless the Government considers a safety net.

"We are frustrated with the progress of our talks with the Government on this issue and want it to look urgently at a model that would allow flood cover to remain widely available and competitively priced. No country in the world has an entirely free market providing universal affordable flood insurance, and action is needed now to avoid 200,000 high-risk homes struggling to afford cover."

The possible non - availability of insurance may make it more difficult for people to find a mortgage for properties in the affected area and may lead to current home owners in those areas feeling trapped. 

Those acting for prospective owners of such property need to keep a close eye on this development and to warn clients of the what is happening and how this could affect the future value of the property.    Looking more closely at environmental reports and assessing the risk of flooding will clearly be needed as will the requirement to report the risk if indentified to the lender.

Unless Government acts quickly to extend the current arrangement we could see a large number of transactions failing over the next 12 months. 

By David Pett Solicitor and Partner

Morgan Jones and Pett are solicitors who provide legal advice and services to clients based in England and Wales and who can be contacted on 01603877000 or via email at davidpett@m-j-p.co.uk